lawyers sanctioned for fantastical election lawsuit

They argued James wasn’t legally allowed to file the lawsuit because there wasn’t any evidence that the public was harmed by Trump’s actions. Trump’s lawyers, in their own summary judgment bid, had asked the judge to throw out the case. Trump’s lawyers have asked an appeals court for a temporary delay. He’ll decide on those claims and James’ request for $250 million in penalties at a trial starting Oct. Manhattan prosecutors had looked into bringing criminal charges over the same conduct but declined to do so, leaving James to sue Trump and seek penalties that aim to disrupt his and his family’s ability to do business in the state.Įngoron’s ruling, in a phase of the case known as summary judgment, resolves the key claim in James’ lawsuit, but several others remain.

“That is a fantasy world, not the real world.” “In defendants’ world: rent regulated apartments are worth the same as unregulated apartments restricted land is worth the same as unrestricted land restrictions can evaporate into thin air a disclaimer by one party casting responsibility on another party exonerates the other party’s lies,” Engoron wrote in his 35-page ruling. Those tactics crossed a line and violated the law, the judge said, rejecting Trump’s contention that a disclaimer on the financial statements absolved him of any wrongdoing. The decision, days before the start of a non-jury trial in James’ lawsuit, is the strongest repudiation yet of Trump’s carefully coiffed image as a wealthy and shrewd real estate mogul turned political powerhouse.īeyond mere bragging about his riches, Trump, his company and key executives repeatedly lied about them on his annual financial statements, reaping rewards such as favorable loan terms and lower insurance costs, Engoron found.

Lawyers sanctioned for fantastical election lawsuit